Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Reanalysis Precipitation Data and Potential Bias Correction Methods for Use in Data-Scarce Areas

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data availability and accessibility often present challenges to resolving regional water management issues. One primary input essential to models and other tools used to inform policy decisions is daily precipitation. Since observed datasets are not always present or accessible, data from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) have become a potential alternative. A comparison of CFSR precipitation data to available observed data from stations in the East African countries Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania showed notable differences between the two datasets, particularly with respect to precipitation totals and number of days receiving rainfall. A sliding window bias correction approach evaluated using 3 methods with 8 different window length and timestep variations showed that empirical quantile mapping with a 30-day sliding window length and 1-day timestep achieved the best performance. A comparison of bias corrected CFSR precipitation data against observed data showed marked improvement in the similarity of the number of wet days and maximum daily rainfall between the two datasets. For precipitation totals, bias correction reduced underprediction errors by 32% and overprediction errors by 81%. Results indicate that bias-corrected CFSR precipitation data provides an improved basis for water resources applications in the study region. Methodologies and approaches are extendable to other data-scarce regions or areas where complete and consistent data are not easily accessible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Datasets developed through this work will be made available through the Purdue University Research Repository (PURR).

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was funded in part by USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project IND00000752.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization of the study. V. M. Garibay and M. W. Gitau designed the framework for the analyses. V. M. Garibay conducted the analysis. V. M. Garibay and M. W. Gitau wrote the manuscript in consultation with N. Kiggundu, D. Moriasi, and F. Mishili. All authors reviewed the results and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret W. Gitau.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 23 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 7180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garibay, V.M., Gitau, M.W., Kiggundu, N. et al. Evaluation of Reanalysis Precipitation Data and Potential Bias Correction Methods for Use in Data-Scarce Areas. Water Resour Manage 35, 1587–1602 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02804-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02804-8

Keywords

Navigation